ACMT News > ACMT News > ACMT Net
Member News   
ACMT Position Statements   by ACMT Practice Committee

These statements are intended to summarize a vast body of reviewed literature and expert opinion in a 1-2 page document with a small number (8-10) of references. The intended audience is both college members and others interested in the given topic. We see these as providing the basis for response to media, patients, and the starting point for further reading. They are not intended to be exhaustive treatises; however they should recognize areas of controversy, providing a position backed by legitimate science. When applicable, each statement should include:

* Introduction Introduce the topic or controversy and provide background regarding context (of exposure, contact, etc.) and purpose.

* Data Where appropriate, this should be broken out into basic science, animal, human (epidemiologic, case-control, anecdotal) components. While raw numbers and summaries of studies are not required, any relative risk data should be referenced.

* Conclusions Brief statement summarizing position of College. While not required, it is encouraged that authors use terms of the Bradford Hill criteria whenever imputing or refuting causation issues (strength of association, specificity, dose response, temporality, coherence, consistency, etc.).

* References Major reviews and critiques. Any specific data cited in the statement should be referenced by author in the body of the statement.

* Date Include the date of submission (month/year) and any revisions noted.

All position statements will be edited by the committee and then referred to the board. Any comments will be reviewed by the authors and the committee. Once endorsed by the board, they will be posted on the ACMT web site and published in an issue of JMT. All position statements will be introduced by a disclaimer indicating that while individual practitioners may differ, this is the position of the college at the time written, after a review of the issue and pertinent literature. All statements should be reviewed on a periodic basis (every 3 years) and as needed when new data or questions arise. The original author(s) will be asked to address any questions, indicating the date of any revisions on the statement. Each author must sign a disclosure form discussing any potential sources of bias and conflict of interest.

Findlay Russel's Venomous Reptile Slides   
ACMT Image Library   
General Forum   
For everything that doesn't fall into the other categories.
The Clinical Forum   
Forum for general toxicology, management, therapeutic strategies and the problems and questions that confront the daily practice of the clinical toxicologist.
General Discussion and Announcements   
General Toxicology   
Management Questions   
What's New   
Professional Societies   
ACMT Announcements   
A place for offers, jobs and other opportunities
Opportunities Available   
Polls and Questionnaires   
FDA MedWatch Advisories   
Media Coverage   
International Toxicology   
Dr. Michael W. Shannon   by ACMT Remembers
The JMT Editor's Blog    by Mark Mycyk
Legal Toxicology   
A collection of cases involving legal matters and toxicology cases.
Medication Safety, Pharmacy & Therapeutics   
Addiction Medicine Section   
Portal: Public/Media   
Portal: Physician   
Portal: Students / Residents   
Portal: Fellowship   
Ask A Toxicologist   
Home Page Slideshow   
Press Releases   
Telemedicine Section   
Outpatient Toxicology   
In Memory   
Practice Patterns   
Practice Economics   
Practice Quality   
Practice Advancement   
Medical Student Education   
The ACMT Connection    
The ACMT Connection May 2017